In his excellent book Writing Winning Business Proposals, professor Richard C. Freed offers an insightful observation. He says of proposals:
“Although a few are outstanding, most aren't. Many offend with 'cut-and-paste' boilerplate, miss important opportunities to provide value, suffer from poor logic and organization, and focus more on you than on me and my organization. Although some do a few things well, some don't do much well at all.”
With all the time and effort that goes into compiling a business proposal, we definitely don’t want to be in the ‘don't do much well at all’ category! After all, proposals aren’t selected but eliminated. The last one standing is the only one that matters in the end.
So how do you get your proposal to hold its ground in comparison to all the others?
Your goal should be to write a proposal that cannot be eliminated on the grounds of content. The first step to ensure that your proposal covers all the requirements is to hold a kickoff meeting. This is where all collaborators needed to put together the proposal have a detailed discussion on the components of it.
The Proposal Manager will clearly define production schedules, the responsibility matrix, and the pressure points that might occur.
A proposal team would ideally involve:
Getting it right in the Kickoff Meeting contributes to ensuring that all aspects of the proposal are being looked into.
Experienced proposal evaluators develop an intuition when it comes to fluff and oversell. Granted, a proposal has to highlight your company and your commitment to providing the best, so you will have to marshal arguments in your favor. But when you overdo it, you lose credibility, and the evaluators are likely to see the rest of your proposal in that light.
In one of its research papers on business proposals, The Association of Record for Bid, Proposal, Business Development, Capture and Graphics Professionals (APMP) offers some suggestions on words to avoid when writing a business proposal:
Avoid:
Use instead:
In a report compiled by evaluating the shortcomings of 605 proposals rejected by the National Institutes of Health, it was seen that nearly 28.8% of proposals are rejected because “The description of the approach is too nebulous, diffuse, and lacking in clarity to permit adequate evaluation.”
Remember that the evaluators are going to be sifting through numerous proposals. Wordy, long-winded sentences and a confusing structure is the last thing they need.
Here are a few suggestions to instantly improve your proposal: