Co-authoring is the process of multiple people collaborating on the same document at the same time. For example, as individuals make changes in the document, everyone on the team can see the edits and provide feedback.
This simultaneous editing facilitates collaborative writing, synchronous communication, responsive feedback, and dynamic editing.
The result is a holistic approach to document development which seamlessly harnesses expertise and perspectives across functional domains, departments, and time zones.
You know the drill: divide the document into chunks and send your experts an email. They carve out time to write the responses and return their portion. You compile these multiple chunks back into the document for review. And repeat until the work is complete or the deadline is upon you.
You're stuck in a repetitive, time-consuming loop that saps productivity:
In the traditional approach to document collaboration, the process resembles a serial assembly line. One person writes a portion, passes the file to the next, who writes a portion, then passes it on, and so forth. This sequential process is time-consuming and prone to disconnects.
Now, imagine this: a data scientist and a business analyst are working on a critical report. As the data scientist types in key findings, the business analyst creates the story around the early results.
The content evolves rapidly, with each contributor building on the other. This dynamic, digital approach leads to a more accurate, insightful, and timely report. This is the reality of real-time collaborative document writing.
By bringing together individuals with different levels of expertise and experience real-time, teams achieve:
Imagine a team of expert reviewers, each with a unique perspective, reviewing a large, complex proposal. In a traditional review process, they get a copy of the document, add their comments, and send it back.
The proposal manager compiles the feedback and shares it with the contributors for revisions. This sequential approach requires manual coordination and is prone to confusion.
Now imagine, the experts review together, as a team. As one reviewer highlights a passage and suggests a rephrasing, others weigh in with their thoughts. A lively discussion ensues, with different viewpoints and debate until the team comes to consensus.
This approach ensures that everyone’s voice participates in the conversation, and aligns with decisions.
Researchers have found that teams who use work together in-parallel outperform individual contributors, leading to higher efficiency and faster project completion.
To maximize the advantages, and mitigate potential pitfalls, consider adopting these best practices:
Traditionally, development of sensitive documents is a serial process. You create a document and send it by email to contributors in different offices and time zones for review. Each cycle involves manual coordination, multiple email exchanges, attachments, and version control issues.
While email is a convenient way to share, it comes with inherent security risks. Malicious actors can intercept and read emails. If attackers compromise an email account, they can access and steal sensitive information. Misdirected emails can expose confidential information to unintended recipients.
By centralizing documents with granular security access, document management platforms built for real-time collaboration offer a more secure and controlled environment.
Imagine a global tech company, poised to change the industry with a groundbreaking innovation.
A diverse team of ten experts from different departments and locations takes on the task. Together they will create a detailed technical document to guide the project's development.
Hardware engineers, software developers, security experts, UX designers, project managers, and technical writers work together. Each person brings their own skills and knowledge. Rather than working in isolation, they collaborate seamlessly on a secure, cloud-based platform.
As they work, they share insights, provide real-time feedback, and refine the content together. You accelerate the creation process, ensuring that the innovation reaches the market faster and more effectively.
Today’s document management systems have significantly improved the way teams work together, especially in remote and hybrid work environments. To effectively support co-authoring, a document management system should possess the following key features:
High-stakes documents, such as competitive proposals, oil and gas licensing applications, and engineering contracts, are large and complex. They can reach hundreds or even thousands of pages, authored by a variety of different experts.
Here’s what to look for to achieve the benefits:
Does your large, complex document development process cause rework and late-night, coffee-fueled work sessions? Co-authoring reclaims significant time on every project.
Modern document management tools like XaitPorter break down expert silos and geographical barriers so you can increase productivity and improve quality. Advanced features, including automation, workflow, auto save, and audit trails boost co-authoring benefits for faster, high-quality document creation.