A parallel process breaks down silos and barriers that hinder content creation and constrain collaboration.
Learn how adopting a parallel approach facilitates simultaneous work and dynamic communication to deliver greater productivity and faster development times.
Search for ‘Serial vs. Parallel Process’ and you’ll find thousands of articles talking about one particular study; Serial vs Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look Like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but They Can (And Should) be Distinguished.
James T. Townsend's work highlights the importance of distinguishing between these two modes of processing:
Working in-parallel offers several advantages over a sequential approach, including completing multiple tasks concurrently to reduce overall development timelines.
Document creation is a detailed and intricate process, and rightly so. Every winning proposal, flawless legal document, or detailed report, requires many hands. The process you choose coordinates those hands.
While following a serial process, step-by-step, can be more straightforward to manage, it can also be time-consuming. Not exactly a perk when it comes to large, complex documents and tight deadlines.
In the traditional approach to document creation, the process resembles a serial assembly line. One expert writes a portion and passes it to the next expert, who writes their share. They pass it on to the next expert, and so forth. The process stalls for review and then kicks-off again, repeating until the document is complete or it's due, whichever comes first.
Not only is this time-consuming, it is also prone to errors, omissions, and redundant effort.
Now, imagine this: a solution architect and a writer are working on a proposal together. As the architect responds to technical requirements, the writer is creating the story around the solution’s outcomes and benefits.
The content evolves rapidly, with each contributor building on the other. At the same time, reviewers weigh in with their thoughts. A lively discussion ensues, with different perspectives and innovations until the team comes to consensus and completes the document.
This dynamic, real-time collaboration leads to a more accurate, insightful, and compelling proposal, faster.
A parallel process involves working on multiple tasks simultaneously. For example, multiple experts working on the same document at the same time. Everyone can see what’s changed real-time, while review feedback drives continuous improvement. This approach significantly accelerates development time and improves overall content quality.
How it works:
A parallel process offers several advantages over a serial, or sequential approach. By adopting a parallel approach, organizations:
The decision to use a serial or parallel process depends on several factors. By carefully considering these factors, you can select the best approach to optimize your document development process.
You might effectively use a serial approach to deliver:
However, a parallel process is recommended when collaborating on:
Modern co-authoring tools like XaitPorter empower an efficient parallel process, regardless of location or time zone. Advanced features, including automation, workflow, version control, and dynamic reviews make it the ideal solution for enterprise organizations seeking to streamline their process and optimize their expert resources.
In fact, XaitPorter teams write large, complex documents 70% faster with:
The choice between serial and parallel process can significantly impact your efficiency and quality. By leveraging modern computing technology to embrace a parallel process, you can eliminate manual effort, save time, and do more with your same staff.